I'm sure we can expect Ms. Jarrett's experience as a slum manager to be quite useful as Obama reshapes this country into an egalitarian paradise like Zimbabwe.
I'm writing totally as a private citizen who happened to see this press release at www.freerepublic.com.
While your group can "investigate" government corruption, you cannot "prosecute", only the Dept. of Justice can, or a similar govt agency with prosecutorial powers.
I suggest that you modify your claim to "investigate" government corruption that should/could lead to legal prosecution". It is much clearer and cannot be used to attack you for "bloviating" or "misleading" your readers/public.
Never give your enemies a chance to discredit you by using your own words.
Just great. A slumlord becomes top Obama advisor. That’s pure partisan politics.What qualifications does she have? I don't see any. Obama is going to turn all of Washington into slum in no time.
Thank you, Judicial Watch, for investigating Obama campaign corruption. I wish to God that you would investigate Obama caucus fraud in Iowa and Texas, as well.
By the way, I am a former Democrat, now an Independent, and so is my husband.
Her involvement in circles of corruption and questionable activities began many years ago and continued until the Rezko investigation and subsequent conviction. About that time many members/supporters of the Chgo. political machine changed focus and became active in the Obama campaign. There does not seem to be any reason to believe a change in her activity except for broader opportunities and possibly, expanded implicit protection against investigation. This might be indicated by future appointments of the federal attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald and his subsequent replacement along with changes in FBI chief and/or investigators as to where the information gotten from Rezko leads.
I had a talk the other day with about ten 1st graders that were spouting off things like Obama kills babies and he is a Buddist. I was shocked that parents chose to speak about such things in front of their children. I would imagine they should be remarking about the system and democracy and why voting is important. In my household we did not tell the children who we voted for until after the election. This way they could decide for themsleves weather they aligned with us or not. We are teaching them to think not mimick us.
After talking with these first graders for sometime I said this... Look whoever you like that is fine. But bad mouthing serves no purpose.Each candidate is doing what they think is best and wants what is best for the USA. They may go about it differently but they both are good men. Whoever is elected will be our next President and it will do our country best for all to rally behind him.
No President had been without fault and I am not sure if any of these folks who have written such harsh allegations have ever held an office. But I am willing to bet not! So think of the nation and not yourself. The nasty talk will do nothing even if you are right.
TO: NOTHING LIKE GETTING BEHIND THE NEW ADMINISTRATION
How/what you teach your kids is your own business, but.
I raised my kids to do their research on every candidate that they get to vote on. Then decide which one has the best character, voting record, has the experience to do the job and has the best interest of the nation as a whole.
A man running for the highest office of the country that will not show respect for the flag of that country because he feels it might hurt some peoples feelings; is a person not qualified to be the president of that country. He can't lead,love, respect, nor defend that nation after all he in his decisions might hurt someones feelings.
Your comment about "rally behind him" is in my opinion not setting the best example for children. That is the same mind set that the Germans had about Adolph Hitler and look what happened to them. In the USA there is no rule or law that requires you to stand behind the person elected. You can still disagree with them and work to get them replaced in the next election. As for respecting the president, you don't have to respect the person but you should respect the office, respect is earned not given.
As for all the negative things said in the election, I agree you should be careful of what you say, but if it is true then there is no problem. After all even the candidates tell lies about their oponets.
For a person who has promised to be able to do so much and to have all the experience necessary, look at how this president elect is building his backers/advisors & cabnet members. This speaks volumes.
And Im quite sure you kept the little troublemakers isolated until you could help them rethink their position.
You have no buisiness having that type of conversation without the parents present. Stick to reading,writing,and arithmatic. That is tour job you are not there to form their opinions for them.
Mon, 11/17/2008 - 6:35pm — Professor N (not verified)
If you look closely, after Jarret left Daley's office, she took Michelle Obama with her to the Chicago Housing Department. Do not know if there are any "documents" with Michelle O's name on them, but she was again Jarret's Asst. Then follow the link to the time they left as asst's to Daley, you will find it coincides nicely with when Obama was installed at Davis, Miner et al, and he was writing the "bids" for Rezko's companies that were the ones approved by Jarret and Michelle. (not proven but as a research professor -would bet on it if Miner ever releases Obama's billing records).
Fantastic work folks! Now all I need to do is find either Jarret's or Michelle's resumes on line. Of course then the package should be sent immediately, if not sooner to Patrick Fitzgerald.
Two weeks ago Valerie Jarrett found out about the Governor's wiretaps she suddenly removed her name from consideration for Obama's senate seat...taped conversations about her dropping out are sure to be revealed in the coming days...expect her to be throw under the bus in the next few weeks! This is one associate the Obama's will have a hard time denying!
IA - either the BHO kamp was tipped that there was a wiretap OR the AG was (candidate #2) and she sent up the alarm, to try and distance them all from it.
The next day, Valerie didn't remove herself from consideration, BHO announced she would be installed as a WH advisor. As though that's what they had planned all along.
Subscribe via RSS
Comments
Is anyone really surprised?
Another crooked association of President-Elect Obama. Is anyone really surprised? These folks will be coming out of the Chicago woodwork!
The author is right . . we DON'T need more corrupt people in Washington DC.
Useful Experience
I'm sure we can expect Ms. Jarrett's experience as a slum manager to be quite useful as Obama reshapes this country into an egalitarian paradise like Zimbabwe.
Your claim about Judicial Watch is misleading
I'm writing totally as a private citizen who happened to see this press release at www.freerepublic.com.
While your group can "investigate" government corruption, you cannot "prosecute", only the Dept. of Justice can, or a similar govt agency with prosecutorial powers.
I suggest that you modify your claim to "investigate" government corruption that should/could lead to legal prosecution". It is much clearer and cannot be used to attack you for "bloviating" or "misleading" your readers/public.
Never give your enemies a chance to discredit you by using your own words.
Max Friedman, historian
Slumlord becomes top Obama advisor
Just great. A slumlord becomes top Obama advisor. That’s pure partisan politics.What qualifications does she have? I don't see any. Obama is going to turn all of Washington into slum in no time.
This is just the beginning
This is just the beginning of the destruction of the United States of America.
corruption in Obama campaign; investigate caucus fraud!!
Thank you, Judicial Watch, for investigating Obama campaign corruption. I wish to God that you would investigate Obama caucus fraud in Iowa and Texas, as well.
By the way, I am a former Democrat, now an Independent, and so is my husband.
Iowa City, Iowa
ARE WE SUPPOSE TO BE
ARE WE SUPPOSE TO BE SURPRISED, GIVEN ALL THE OTHER DEALINGS OF OBAMAS
REALLY NOW, HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK THE PEOPLE ARE? ITS NICE THAT
IT CAN BE ADDED TO THE LIST OF WHY I WOULDN'T AND DIDN'T VOTE OBAMA.
What's new These are BHO's
What's new
These are BHO's friends
Well, at least, according to
Well, at least, according to the questionare, no one in her family owns a gun.
Valerie Jarrett
All this seemed to have happened years ago. Is she not allowed back into society ever again?
Valerie Jarrett
Her involvement in circles of corruption and questionable activities began many years ago and continued until the Rezko investigation and subsequent conviction. About that time many members/supporters of the Chgo. political machine changed focus and became active in the Obama campaign. There does not seem to be any reason to believe a change in her activity except for broader opportunities and possibly, expanded implicit protection against investigation. This might be indicated by future appointments of the federal attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald and his subsequent replacement along with changes in FBI chief and/or investigators as to where the information gotten from Rezko leads.
Wow nothing like getting behind the new administration
I had a talk the other day with about ten 1st graders that were spouting off things like Obama kills babies and he is a Buddist. I was shocked that parents chose to speak about such things in front of their children. I would imagine they should be remarking about the system and democracy and why voting is important. In my household we did not tell the children who we voted for until after the election. This way they could decide for themsleves weather they aligned with us or not. We are teaching them to think not mimick us.
After talking with these first graders for sometime I said this... Look whoever you like that is fine. But bad mouthing serves no purpose.Each candidate is doing what they think is best and wants what is best for the USA. They may go about it differently but they both are good men. Whoever is elected will be our next President and it will do our country best for all to rally behind him.
No President had been without fault and I am not sure if any of these folks who have written such harsh allegations have ever held an office. But I am willing to bet not! So think of the nation and not yourself. The nasty talk will do nothing even if you are right.
comment
TO: NOTHING LIKE GETTING BEHIND THE NEW ADMINISTRATION
How/what you teach your kids is your own business, but.
I raised my kids to do their research on every candidate that they get to vote on. Then decide which one has the best character, voting record, has the experience to do the job and has the best interest of the nation as a whole.
A man running for the highest office of the country that will not show respect for the flag of that country because he feels it might hurt some peoples feelings; is a person not qualified to be the president of that country. He can't lead,love, respect, nor defend that nation after all he in his decisions might hurt someones feelings.
Your comment about "rally behind him" is in my opinion not setting the best example for children. That is the same mind set that the Germans had about Adolph Hitler and look what happened to them. In the USA there is no rule or law that requires you to stand behind the person elected. You can still disagree with them and work to get them replaced in the next election. As for respecting the president, you don't have to respect the person but you should respect the office, respect is earned not given.
As for all the negative things said in the election, I agree you should be careful of what you say, but if it is true then there is no problem. After all even the candidates tell lies about their oponets.
For a person who has promised to be able to do so much and to have all the experience necessary, look at how this president elect is building his backers/advisors & cabnet members. This speaks volumes.
Indoctrination
And Im quite sure you kept the little troublemakers isolated until you could help them rethink their position.
You have no buisiness having that type of conversation without the parents present. Stick to reading,writing,and arithmatic. That is tour job you are not there to form their opinions for them.
Valerie Jarret
If you look closely, after Jarret left Daley's office, she took Michelle Obama with her to the Chicago Housing Department. Do not know if there are any "documents" with Michelle O's name on them, but she was again Jarret's Asst. Then follow the link to the time they left as asst's to Daley, you will find it coincides nicely with when Obama was installed at Davis, Miner et al, and he was writing the "bids" for Rezko's companies that were the ones approved by Jarret and Michelle. (not proven but as a research professor -would bet on it if Miner ever releases Obama's billing records).
Fantastic work folks! Now all I need to do is find either Jarret's or Michelle's resumes on line. Of course then the package should be sent immediately, if not sooner to Patrick Fitzgerald.
Into society, maybe. Just
Into society, maybe. Just not into our government.
Bush and Rezko, Clinton and Rezko
Bush and Clinton knew Rezko before Obama did and donated to Bush as well. I think this probably will end your story??
Valerie Jarrett
Two weeks ago Valerie Jarrett found out about the Governor's wiretaps she suddenly removed her name from consideration for Obama's senate seat...taped conversations about her dropping out are sure to be revealed in the coming days...expect her to be throw under the bus in the next few weeks! This is one associate the Obama's will have a hard time denying!
IA - either the BHO kamp was
IA - either the BHO kamp was tipped that there was a wiretap OR the AG was (candidate #2) and she sent up the alarm, to try and distance them all from it.
The next day, Valerie didn't remove herself from consideration, BHO announced she would be installed as a WH advisor. As though that's what they had planned all along.